Korean J Anesthesiol Search

CLOSE


Korean J Anesthesiol > Epub ahead of print
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24336    [Epub ahead of print]
Published online August 23, 2024.
Effects of opioid-sparing general anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic gynecological surgery
Sun Woo Nam1, Sang-Hwan Do2,3, Jung-Won Hwang2,3, Insun Park2, Insung Hwang2, Hyo-Seok Na2,3 
1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
3Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Corresponding author:  Hyo-Seok Na, Tel: +82-31-787-7507, 
Email: hsknana@gmail.com
Received: 19 May 2024   • Revised: 18 July 2024   • Accepted: 26 July 2024
Abstract
Background
In this study, we aimed to investigate whether opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.
Methods
Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to either the opioid-using anesthesia (OUA) or the OSA groups. In the OUA group, remifentanil was administered as an opioid during general anesthesia. In the OSA group, apart from a single dose of 5 μg/kg of alfentanil for tracheal intubation, no other opioids were used. In both groups, a multimodal intravenous non-opioid analgesic regimen was used preferentially in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV, assessed by symptoms until the postoperative day (POD) 1.
Results
A total of 120 patients were included in this study. The incidence of nausea in the PACU was significantly lower in the OSA group compared to in the OUA group (31.7% in the OSA group vs. 51.7% in the OUA group, P = 0.026). Pain scores and the incidence of opioid analgesic administration were lower in the OSA group during PACU stay, resulting in a significantly lower number of patients requiring rescue opioid analgesics (3.3% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.008). There were no significant differences in intraoperative vital signs, hemodynamic interventions, or duration of PACU and hospital stay between the two groups.
Conclusions
OSA significantly reduced postoperative nausea, pain scores, and the need for rescue analgesics in the PACU without increasing hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.
Key Words: Analgesia; Anesthesia; Gynecologic surgical procedures; Opioid; Postoperative nausea and vomiting; Postoperative pain


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
(서울특별시 마포구 마포대로 109 롯데캐슬 프레지던트 101동 3503호)
Tel: +82-2-792-5128    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail: journal@anesthesia.or.kr                
Business Name: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists (대한마취통증의학회)
Business Registration: 106-82-07194
Representative: Jun Heum Yon (연준흠)

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next