Korean J Anesthesiol Search


Korean J Anesthesiol > Volume 70(5); 2017 > Article
Shim: Is ultrasound-guided procedure entirely reliable?
Regional anesthesia is a useful adjunct to general anesthesia, and can be used as the sole anesthesia for upper or lower extremity surgery. Especially peripheral nerve blocks have been used for upper extremity surgery as an important anesthetic technique from the past. The upper extremity blocks include supraclavicular, infraclavicular, interscalene, and axillary plexus block. The interscalene block and brachial plexus block (BPB) were first described in the early 1900s [1]. Nerve blocks including upper extremity blockade have been usually performed by reference to anatomical landmarks. For improved accuracy and effectiveness, the nerve stimulator technique was introduced in the late 1980s, while the ultrasound (US)-guided technique started in the early 1990s [2].
The use of US for nerve blockade has increased with the development of high resolution equipment, increased portability, and decreased costs. The US-guided technique has several advantages, including ease of performance, visualization of soft tissues and real-time needle advancement, no exposure to radiation, and observation of the spread of the injected local anesthetic [3]. A systematic review summarized the evidences for the superior onset, quality, and duration of block for US guidance versus other techniques for nerve localization [4]. According to this review, US guidance confers a modest improvement in block onset and the quality of peripheral nerve blocks, especially for the lower extremity. Sonographic visualization of the peripheral nerve and surrounding anatomy can provide valuable information for diagnostic purposes and procedure enhancement [5]. US-guided techniques for visualizing the needle tip and observing the spread of injected local anesthetic can reduce the risk of side effects, such as accidental intravascular injection and trauma to the surrounding tissues. US-guided technique also reduces the anesthetic volume required to produce an effective block [6]. However, there are some limits to US imaging, such as the inability to visualize deep structures, a narrow imaging window, artifacts, operator-dependent imaging performance, and difficulty of mastery.
In this issue of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, two cases of complications associated with US procedures are introduced. Kang et al. [7] reported a neurologic complication after US-guided supraclavicular BPB and Beh et al. [8] described a pulmonary complication induced by phrenic nerve block after interscalene BPB.
Upper extremity blocks are known to cause side effects, such as nerve damage, local anesthesia toxicity due to intravascular injection, pneumothorax, and diaphragm dysfunction. A recent update report by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine concluded that US-guided technique reduces the incidence and intensity of hemidiaphragmatic paresis, but has no significant effect on the incidence of postoperative neurological symptoms. US guidance reduces the risk of local anesthesia toxicity and may also reduce the frequency of pneumothorax, but training in visualization of the needle is required [6,9].
The development of US-guided techniques and advance in equipment open a new horizon in regional anesthesia and pain management. US is a rapidly developing area of technology and some of the newer modalities are discussed. US has been applied to peripheral musculoskeletal and axial structures, including by caudal and interlaminar epidural injections, cervical and lumbar facet injections, medial branch blocks, and sacroiliac joint injections [10,11]. New procedures and equipment have also been attempted, such as a perineural catheter [12] and US-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis [13]. Further technological developments should allow for more accurate, higher resolution, and smaller sized US machine. Nevertheless, we should not place our complete trust in US-guided nerve block, because the accuracy and safety of US-guided nerve block depend entirely on the skill and technique of the practitioner. As there is a significant learning curve associated with US-guided procedures, proper training is crucial for safe and successful practice. Therefore, a useful and well-organized training program in US-guided technique needs to be provided for trainees at all training hospitals.


1. Labat G. Brachial plexus block: some details of technique. Anesth Analg 1927; 6: 81–82.
2. Kapral S, Krafft P, Eibenberger K, Fitzgerald R, Gosch M, Weinstabl C. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 507–513. PMID: 8109769.
crossref pmid
3. Korbe S, Udoji EN, Ness TJ, Udoji MA. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures for chronic pain management. Pain Manag 2015; 5: 465–482. PMID: 26402316.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Liu SS. Evidence basis for ultrasound-guided block characteristics onset, quality, and duration. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016; 41: 205–220. PMID: 26244287.
crossref pmid
5. Strakowski JA. Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve procedures. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2016; 27: 687–715. PMID: 27468673.
crossref pmid
6. Brattwall M, Jildenstål P, Warrén Stomberg M, Jakobsson JG. Upper extremity nerve block: how can benefit, duration, and safety be improved? An update. F1000Res 2016; 5.
7. Kang BJ, Song J, Ji S, Kim JP. Myoclonus of ipsilateral upper extremity after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with mepivacaine. Korean J Anesthesiol 2017; 70: 577–579.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Beh ZY, Tham HM, Lim YC, Lim NL. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism due to the use of interscalene block. Korean J Anesthesiol 2017; 70: 580–581.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Neal JM, Brull R, Horn JL, Liu SS, McCartney CJ, Perlas A, et al. The second American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: executive summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016; 41: 181–194. PMID: 26695878.
crossref pmid
10. Hurdle MF. Ultrasound-guided spinal procedures for pain: a review. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2016; 27: 673–686. PMID: 27468672.
crossref pmid
11. Re M, Blanco J, Gómez de Segura IA. Ultrasound-guided nerve block anesthesia. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2016; 32: 133–147. PMID: 26922116.
crossref pmid
12. Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: an update of the published evidence and comparison with novel, alternative analgesic modalities. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 308–335. PMID: 27749354.
crossref pmid
13. Ilfeld BM, Gabriel RA, Trescot AM. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis providing postoperative analgesia lasting multiple weeks following a single administration: a replacement for continuous peripheral nerve blocks? Korean J Anesthesiol 2017; 70: 567–570.
crossref pmid pmc


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-795-5129    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail: anesthesia@kams.or.kr                

Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2community

Close layer
prev next