Korean J Anesthesiol Search

CLOSE


Korean J Anesthesiol > Volume 70(4); 2017 > Article
Fujita, Inoue, Sakamoto, Yoshizawa, Tomita, Toyo'oka, and Sobue: Relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and plasma dexmedetomidine concentration in critically ill infants: a prospective observational cohort study

Abstract

Background

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective central α2-agonist used as a sedative in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). However, little is known about the relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and its plasma concentration during long-term infusion. We have previously demonstrated that the sedative plasma dexmedetomidine concentration is moderately correlated with the administered dose in adults (r = 0.653, P = 0.001). We hypothesized that there would be a similar relationship between the sedative dexmedetomidine concentration and administered dose in infants.

Methods

All patients admitted to the PICU at Nagoya City University Hospital, Japan, between November 2012 and March 2013 were eligible for inclusion in the study. Plasma dexmedetomidine concentration was measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

Results

We measured the plasma dexmedetomidine concentration in 203 samples from 45 patients. Of these, 96 samples collected from 27 patients < 2 years old were included in this study. All patients received dexmedetomidine at 0.12–1.40 µg/kg/h. The median administration duration was 87.6 hours (range: 6–540 hours). Plasma dexmedetomidine concentration ranged from 0.07 to 3.17 ng/ml. Plasma dexmedetomidine concentration was not correlated with the administered dose (r = 0.273, P = 0.007). The approximate linear equation was y = 0.690x + 0.423.

Conclusions

In infants, plasma dexmedetomidine concentration did not exhibit any correlation with administered dose, which is not a reliable means of obtaining optimal plasma concentration.

Introduction

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective central α2-agonist with anesthetic and analgesic properties used in critically ill pediatric patients [1,2]. Dexmedetomidine has been used in children with heart disease [3,4,5,6], those undergoing mechanical ventilation [7], and as part of an early extubation strategy [8]. A long duration of administration may be required [5]. However, dexmedetomidine causes bradycardia, hypotension, and hypertension [9,10]; it was reported to be responsible for sinus arrest in a healthy young adult volunteer [11] and bradycardia followed by asystole in a 52-year-old woman undergoing thymectomy [12]. In children, the extent of these hemodynamic variations was reported to be related to the serum dexmedetomidine concentration [13]. A comprehensive understanding of the pharmacological, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine, and the best means of maintaining optimal plasma dexmedetomidine concentration, are critical for its safe and efficacious use in pediatric perioperative and critical care settings [14].
The recommended dose of dexmedetomidine for children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is intravenous infusion of 0.12–1.4 µg/kg/h. There are no methods for simulating blood dexmedetomidine concentration. We have shown previously that a dexmedetomidine dose of 0.20–0.83 µg/kg/h achieved effective sedation in adults, with a plasma dexmedetomidine concentration of 0.22–2.50 ng/ml; dexmedetomidine concentration was moderately correlated with the administered dose (r = 0.653, P < 0.01) [15]. The relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and plasma concentration during long-term infusion in critically ill children is not completely understood [16,17].
Our primary aim was to investigate whether the correlation coefficient between the sedative dose of dexmedetomidine and its plasma concentration in infants would exceed 0.5. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of infants admitted to the PICU at our institution.

Materials and Methods

Ethical considerations

This study was conducted in the PICU of Nagoya City University Hospital, Japan. The name of the registry site was the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (unique trial number: UMIN000009115). Ethical approval for the study was provided by the Ethics Committee of Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan, in July 2012 (chair Professor Y. Fujii, reference number 688). The requirement for written informed consent from participants' parents or caregivers was waived by the Ethics Committee, as we used blood samples < 0.5 ml that would otherwise have been discarded after routine blood gas analysis every morning. Nevertheless, we explained the study to the infants' parents or caregivers and recorded their agreement to participate in the medical records.

Participants

We recruited consecutive children < 2 years old admitted to the PICU of our institution between November 2012 and March 2013. We excluded infants in whom the dose of dexmedetomidine was changed within 6 hours. Dexmedetomidine was not administered to patients with a history of intolerance to dexmedetomidine, or with significant metabolic, hematological, or endocrine disease.
Patients received continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (Precedex®; Hospira Japan, Osaka, Japan) at 0.12–1.4 µg/kg/h without a loading dose. Dexmedetomidine was administered based on clinical need, and all other standard PICU care needs were met. Standard care included intravenous administration of fentanyl or morphine as an analgesic, potentially supplemented by midazolam as a sedative. The oral sedative-hypnotic agents diazepam, triclofos, clonidine, and phenobarbital were also used in selected patients at the discretion of the supervising physician. Sedation was assessed using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) as follows: +4, combative; +3, very agitated; +2, agitated; +1, restless; 0, alert and calm; −1, drowsy; −2, light sedation; −3, moderate sedation; −4, deep sedation; −5, unarousable. Arterial blood gas analysis was routinely performed (once daily between 05:00 and 07:00). Blood that would otherwise have been discarded was collected immediately in EDTA tubes. Samples were stored at 4℃ and centrifuged. Plasma was frozen at −80℃ after separation and stored until analysis.
Measurement of dexmedetomidine concentration was performed by a single blind method. Arterial blood samples were numbered and no clinical information, including on whether dexmedetomidine had been administered, was provided to the investigators performing the assays. We have established a method to measure dexmedetomidine concentration using only 10 µl of plasma [18]. Briefly, dexmedetomidine was quantified using the original stable dexmedetomidine-d3 for electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) in the selected reaction monitoring mode. A rapid, ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography technique was adopted using ESI-MS/MS with a runtime of 3 minutes. Samples were prepared using a solid-phase extraction technique with an OASIS-HLB cartridge. Recovery values ranged from 99.8% to 100.3% for the intra-day (relative standard deviation [RSD] 0.9–1.3%) and inter-day (RSD 0.9–1.5%) assays. A stable test was defined as having recovery values in the range 97.8–99.7%, with an RSD 1.0–1.9% for the process/wet extract, bench-top, freeze-thaw, and long-term tests. We judged that an efficacious plasma concentration lay in the range 50 pg/ml to 5 ng/ml. The lower limit of quantification was 5 pg/ml.

Statistical analysis

Power analysis was calculated for the primary endpoint, the correlation coefficient between dexmedetomidine dose and plasma dexmedetomidine concentration. Our preliminary data (sample number = 43) estimated the correlation coefficient to be 0.42. A total sample size of 48–82 was judged to be necessary to obtain a correlation coefficient of 0.35–0.45 and detect the primary outcome with statistical significance, assuming a two-tailed type I error of 5% and type II error of 10%. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess the distribution of data. Data are presented as means ± SD for normally distributed variables, the median [interquartile range, IQR] for non-normally distributed variables, or S the number (proportion, %), as appropriate. The relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and its plasma concentration was determined by linear regression. The correlation coefficient was calculated with Pearson's r or Spearman's ρ, according to the type of distribution. All P values are two-tailed. In all analyses, P < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.
We also assessed the relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and its plasma concentration in a variety of subgroups: patients undergoing single- or two-ventricle cardiac surgery; patients stratified according to Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) score (comparing those with RACHS scores of 1–3 to those with scores of 4–6); and patents grouped according to the curative or palliative surgical strategy and age. Finally, we measured the correlation coefficient in patients from whom more than five samples were obtained.
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (ver. 19.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Participants

After exclusions, we collected 96 samples from 27 patients; plasma dexmedetomidine concentration was measured after assay failure in four specimens (Fig. 1). The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. All patients received dexmedetomidine at 0.12–1.40 µg/kg/h (Table 2) and all patients had cardiac disease: 24 had undergone cardiac correction surgery, and the remaining 3 had undergone non-cardiac surgery after previous cardiac repair. Of those that had undergone previous cardiac surgery, one patient underwent Nissen fundoplication having previously undergone the Jatene procedure for complete transposition of the great arteries, one underwent surgery for imperforate anus having undergone the Glenn procedure for double-outlet right ventricle, and the other underwent cleft lip repair after ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus.

Dexmedetomidine dose and plasma concentration

The dexmedetomidine dose had not been changed for at least 6 hours before all samples were collected. The median (range) duration of administration was 60.0 (6-276) hours. Dexmedetomidine concentration ranged from 0.07 to 3.17 ng/ml. Dexmedetomidine concentration was not correlated with the administered dose (r = 0.273, P = 0.007). The approximate linear equation was y = 0.690x + 0.423 (Fig. 2). The RASS score ranged from 0 to –5 (Table 2).

Subgroup analyses

Subgroup analyses indicated that neither single- or two-ventricle repair, RACHS-1 score, nor surgical strategy influenced the relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and plasma concentration (Table 3). There was also no significant correlation when only the data of patients with five or more samples were analyzed (Table 3, Fig. 3). Finally, age did not influence the strength of the relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and its plasma concentration: the correlation coefficient was 0.325 in those aged ≤ 1 year (sample number = 72, P = 0.005), compared with 0.310 in those aged ≥ 1 year but ≤ 2 years (sample number = 24, P = 0.140).

Concomitant drugs administered

The median [IQR] doses of co-administered drugs were as follows: fentanyl, 1.35 [0.66–2.56] µg/kg/h; morphine, 9.80 [6.00–15.39] µg/kg/h; midazolam, 0.16 [0.10–0.33] mg/kg/h; diazepam, 0.41 [0.38–0.48] mg/kg/day; triclofos, 42.6 [11.0–64.1] mg/kg/day; clonidine, 13.2 [9.90–16.0] µg/kg/day; and phenobarbital, 2.94 [2.94–2.94] mg/kg/day.

Discussion

We found that plasma dexmedetomidine concentration ranged from 0.07 to 3.17 ng/ml in critically ill children under 2 years old administered a dose of 0.2–1.40 µg/kg/h. There was no relationship between plasma dexmedetomidine concentration and the administered dose, even in specific subgroups, in contrast to our previous study in adults that identified a moderate correlation [15]. In our cohort of critically ill infants, administration of the recommended dose of dexmedetomidine did not reliably achieve an optimal plasma concentration. A recent systematic review reported that while 57.6% of PICU patients were optimally sedated, 10.6% were under-sedated and 31.8% were over-sedated [19]. Our findings may explain the high proportion of PICU patients that are not optimally sedated. Physicians must therefore take great care when administering dexmedetomidine to infants.
Although the sedative concentration of dexmedetomidine in infants is not known, the concentrations that we identified were judged to be sufficient to achieve sedation in our cohort. The range in our cohort corresponded closely to the sedative concentration reported in adults (0.2–3.2 ng/ml) [20]. Chrysostomou et al. [21] reported that after cardiac surgery in neonates and infants, a higher maximum dexmedetomidine dose of 1.25 µg/kg/h was well tolerated and provided adequate sedation. In addition, Vilo et al. [22] noted a trend toward a need for an increased dexmedetomidine dose in patients younger than 1 year old. Furthermore, when dexmedetomidine was administered to our cohort with other analgesics and sedatives, we achieved RASS scores from 0 to −5 and only 9.4% had scores of −4 or −5, which are suggestive of over-sedation. Based on these findings, our dexmedetomidine concentration range (0.07–3.17 ng/ml) is likely to represent the sedative concentration in infants.
There may be several explanations for the absence of a relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and its plasma concentration in the present study compared to our previous finding of a moderate correlation in adults, some of which may be a consequence of the study's limitations. First, dosing regimens were based on body weight, a greater proportion of which may change during critical illness in infants compared with adults (all participants in our cohort weighed < 10 kg). Furthermore, body weight was measured before surgery or the onset of critical illness. Changes in body weight, and concomitant changes in blood volume, may be responsible for the variation in plasma dexmedetomidine concentration found here. Second, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine are poorly understood and unpredictable in this population, particularly in infants with organ failure [23], and both may differ substantially from those in critically ill adults due to differences in protein binding, distribution, and clearance [24]. Third, our cohort was recruited from a single center and all had undergone cardiac surgery, which was performed during the same admission in the majority of cases. This population may therefore not completely reflect typical PICU patients with regard to hemodynamic status, disease severity, or neurodevelopmental stage. Infants with normal cardiac anatomy may exhibit a different relationship between dexmedetomidine concentration and dose. Although a high proportion of participants in our previous study in adults had also undergone cardiac surgery [15], the nature of cardiac disease and comorbidities are substantially different in infants. Fourth, the sample sizes in our subgroup analyses may have been too small to reliably detect a significant relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and its plasma concentration. Future studies should include larger samples of participants with specific cardiovascular disorders, and participants with non-cardiac diseases. Furthermore, as dexmedetomidine is increasingly used to sedate children outside the PICU [25,26], it will be important to determine its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties in other clinical settings.
Our study had several other limitations. First, as its design was observational, strategies for the administration of dexmedetomidine and other sedative and analgesic drugs were tailored to each infant at the discretion of the supervising physician and other clinical staff. In future studies, consideration should be given to administering other sedatives and analgesics according to a protocol, titrated by sedation and pain scores. Second, multiple samples were obtained from some patients, so we cannot exclude the possibility that these may have influenced our findings for all participants. Finally, we defined an infant as a child under 2 years old, when typically the term is used to refer to children under 1 year old. Unlike some institutions where the youngest children are admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit, we admit all critically ill children to our PICU from birth onward. Consequently, including patients up to the age of 2 years more closely represents our routine clinical practice; furthermore, we found that age did not influence the correlation coefficient.
In conclusion, a dexmedetomidine dose of 0.12–1.40 µg/kg/h achieved a sedative plasma dexmedetomidine concentration of 0.07–3.17 ng/ml in critically ill infants under 2 years old. There was no relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and its plasma concentration. These observations suggest that administration of the recommended dose of dexmedetomidine did not reliably achieve the optimal plasma concentration in critically ill infants.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Yoshiki Sento, Dr. Shinichiro Yoshimura, Dr. Yoshiyuki Nishizawa, Dr. Emi Sato, Dr. Miki Nakano, Dr. Kazuma Fujikake, Dr. Satoshi Aoki, Dr. Yukiko Mori, Dr. Taiki Kojima, Dr. Kentaro Miyake, and Dr. Toshihiro Yasui for their help collecting arterial samples and acquiring the data.

Notes

It was presented the Annual Congress of the European Society of Anaesthesiology, May 2015, CityCube Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

References

1. Krauss B, Green SM. Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet 2006; 367: 766–780. PMID: 16517277.
crossref pmid
2. Tobias JD. Dexmedetomidine: applications in pediatric critical care and pediatric anesthesiology. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2007; 8: 115–131. PMID: 17273114.
crossref pmid
3. Hosokawa K, Shime N, Kato Y, Taniguchi A, Maeda Y, Miyazaki T, et al. Dexmedetomidine sedation in children after cardiac surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2010; 11: 39–43. PMID: 19593247.
crossref pmid
4. Tokuhira N, Atagi K, Shimaoka H, Ujiro A, Otsuka Y, Ramsay M. Dexmedetomidine sedation for pediatric post-Fontan procedure patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2009; 10: 207–212. PMID: 19188869.
crossref pmid
5. Gupta P, Whiteside W, Sabati A, Tesoro TM, Gossett JM, Tobias JD, et al. Safety and efficacy of prolonged dexmedetomidine use in critically ill children with heart disease. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012; 13: 660–666. PMID: 22791093.
crossref pmid
6. Lam F, Bhutta AT, Tobias JD, Gossett JM, Morales L, Gupta P. Hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine in critically ill neonates and infants with heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2012; 33: 1069–1077. PMID: 22327182.
crossref pmid
7. Czaja AS, Zimmerman JJ. The use of dexmedetomidine in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2009; 10: 381–386. PMID: 19325505.
crossref pmid
8. Le KN, Moffett BS, Ocampo EC, Zaki J, Mossad EB. Impact of dexmedetomidine on early extubation in pediatric cardiac surgical patients. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 686–690. PMID: 21308359.
crossref pmid
9. Mason KP, Lerman J. Dexmedetomidine in children: current knowledge and future applications. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 1129–1142. PMID: 21821507.
crossref pmid
10. Buck ML. Dexmedetomidine use in pediatric intensive care and procedural sedation. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2010; 15: 17–29. PMID: 22477789.
pmid pmc
11. Scheinin H, Aantaa R, Anttila M, Hakola P, Helminen A, Karhuvaara S. Reversal of the sedative and sympatholytic effects of dexmedetomidine with a specific alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist atipamezole: a pharmacodynamic and kinetic study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 574–584. PMID: 9743392.
crossref pmid
12. Ingersoll-Weng E, Manecke GR Jr, Thistlethwaite PA. Dexmedetomidine and cardiac arrest. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 738–739. PMID: 15108994.
crossref pmid
13. Petroz GC, Sikich N, James M, van Dyk H, Shafer SL, Schily M, et al. A phase I, two-center study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine in children. Anesthesiology 2006; 105: 1098–1110. PMID: 17122572.
crossref pmid
14. Mahmoud M, Mason KP. Dexmedetomidine: review, update, and future considerations of paediatric perioperative and periprocedural applications and limitations. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 171–182. PMID: 26170346.
crossref pmid
15. Fujita Y, Inoue K, Sakamoto T, Yoshizawa S, Tomita M, Maeda Y, et al. A comparison between dosages and plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in clinically ill patients: a prospective, observational, cohort study in Japan. J Intensive Care 2013; 1: 15PMID: 25705407.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Venn RM, Karol MD, Grounds RM. Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine infusions for sedation of postoperative patients requiring intensive caret. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 669–675. PMID: 12067004.
crossref pmid pdf
17. Iirola T, Ihmsen H, Laitio R, Kentala E, Aantaa R, Kurvinen JP, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine during long-term sedation in intensive care patients. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 460–468. PMID: 22277665.
crossref pmid pdf
18. Inoue K, Sakamoto T, Fujita Y, Yoshizawa S, Tomita M, Min JZ, et al. Development of a stable isotope dilution UPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of dexmedetomidine in a small amount of human plasma. Biomed Chromatogr 2013; 27: 853–858. PMID: 23401046.
crossref pmid
19. Vet NJ, Ista E, de Wildt SN, van Dijk M, Tibboel D, de Hoog M. Optimal sedation in pediatric intensive care patients: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 1524–1534. PMID: 23778830.
crossref pmid
20. Ebert TJ, Hall JE, Barney JA, Uhrich TD, Colinco MD. The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 382–394. PMID: 10910487.
crossref pmid
21. Chrysostomou C, Sanchez De Toledo J, Avolio T, Motoa MV, Berry D, Morell VO, et al. Dexmedetomidine use in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit: can we use it in infants after cardiac surgery? Pediatr Crit Care Med 2009; 10: 654–660. PMID: 19295456.
crossref pmid
22. Vilo S, Rautiainen P, Kaisti K, Aantaa R, Scheinin M, Manner T, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous dexmedetomidine in children under 11 yr of age. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 697–700. PMID: 18378546.
crossref pmid pdf
23. Zuppa AF, Barrett JS. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the critically ill child. Pediatr Clin North Am 2008; 55: 735–755. PMID: 18501763.
crossref pmid
24. Vet NJ, de Hoog M, Tibboel D, de Wildt SN. The effect of inflammation on drug metabolism: a focus on pediatrics. Drug Discov Today 2011; 16: 435–442. PMID: 21376135.
crossref pmid
25. Kim SK, Song MH, Lee IJ, Lee JH, Choi IC. Dexmedetomidine for sedation in pediatric patients who received more than 20 sessions of radiation therapy: two cases report. Korean J Anesthesiol 2016; 69: 627–631. PMID: 27924206.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Ko BJ, Jang JH, Park JW, Lee SC, Choi SR. Procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine for pediatric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography guided stone retraction. Korean J Anesthesiol 2012; 63: 567–568. PMID: 23277822.
crossref pmid pmc
Fig. 1

Flow of participants from assessment to enrollment in analysis.

kjae-70-426-g001.jpg
Fig. 2

Relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and plasma dexmedetomidine concentration in infants. Plasma dexmedetomidine concentration was weakly correlated with the administered dose (r = 0.273, P = 0.007). The approximate linear equation was y = 0.690x + 0.423.

kjae-70-426-g002.jpg
Fig. 3

Subgroup analyses showing the relationship between dexmedetomidine dose and plasma dexmedetomidine concentration in: (A) ventricular septal defect closure; (B, D, and E) curative repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect; (C) curative repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (Table 3); (F) five patients with more than five samples. In (A, B and F) the correlation coefficients were statistically significant; however, there was a wide range of slopes of the approximate linear equations (0.676, 0.826, and 1.729, respectively). It is difficult to definitively conclude that there was a significant correlation between dexmedetomidine dose and plasma dexmedetomidine concentration in these subgroups. The approximate linear equations were: (A) y = 0.826x + 0.031; (B) y = 0.676x + 0.277; (C) y = 1.295x + 0.352; (D) y = 2.544x − 0.543; (E) y = 3.596x − 0.274; (F) y = 1.729x − 0.312.

kjae-70-426-g003.jpg
Table 1

Patient Characteristics

Infant
Number 27
Age (months) 8.0 [0.5–23]
M/F 11/16
Weight (kg) 5.9 ± 1.75 (2.6–9.4)
Main reason for ICU admission, n (%)
 Medical 0 (0%)
 Surgical 27 (100%)
Cardiac disease
 VSD 7 (25.9%)
 DORV 4 (14.8%)
 TAPVC 4 (14.8%)
 TOF 3 (11.1%)
 CAVSD 3 (11.1%)
 TGA 2 (7.4%)
 SRV 2 (7.4%)
 SLV 1 (3.7%)
 PDA 1 (3.7%)

Values are mean ± SD (range), median [interquartile range] or number (%).

ICU: intensive care unit, VSD: ventricular septal defect, DORV: double outlet right ventricle, TAPVC: total anomalous pulmonary venous connection, TOF: tetralogy of Fallot, cAVSD: complete atrioventricular septal defect, TGA: transposition of the great arteries, SRV: single right ventricle, SLV: single left ventricle, PDA: patent ductus arteriosus.

Table 2

Details of Administered Dexmedetomidine and Sedation

In 96 samples of 27 infants
Drug treatment
 Duration of infusion (h) 60 [12, 108]
(6–276)
 Plasma concentrations (ng/ml) 0.86 ± 0.65
(0.07–4.68)
 Dosages (µg/kg/h) 0.63 [0.40–0.71]
(0.12–1.40)
 Combined administration
 No drug (only dexmedetomidine) 11 (11.5%)
 1 drug (with fentanyl or morphine) 22 (22.9%)
 2 drugs* 49 (51.0%)
 3 or more drugs† 14 (14.6%)
 Fentanyl 71 (74.0%)
 Midazolam 51 (57.3%)
Management with artificial ventilation 74 (77.1%)
RASS
 ≥ 1 0 (0%)
 0 10 (10.4%)
 −1 12 (12.5%)
 −2 45 (46.9%)
 −3 20 (20.8%)
 −4 6 (6.3%)
 −5 3 (3.1%)

Values are mean ± SD (range), median [interquartile range] (range) or number (%). Mechanical ventilation: respiratory management with mechanical ventilation when obtaining sample. *One sedative and one analgesic drug, ≥ 3 sedative and analgesic drugs. RASS: Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale.

Table 3

Subgroup Analysis of Correlation Coefficient between Plasma Concentration and Dose of Dexmedetomidine

Subgroups Sample (n = 96) Patients (n = 27) Correlation coefficient P value
Single- or two-ventricle
 Single ventricle 8 4 0.643 0.085
 Two ventricle 88 23 0.082 0.450
RACHS-1
 1–3 81 23 0.162 0.149
 4–6 15 4 0.149 0.597
Curative repair or palliative operation
 Curative repair 79 17 0.118 0.300
 Palliative operation 17 10 0.196 0.451
The same patient with several samples
 A: VSD closure 12 0.583 0.047
 B: curative repair for cAVSD 11 0.844 0.001
 C: curative repair of TAPVC 7 0.477 0.279
 D: curative repair of cAVSD 7 0.612 0.144
 E: curative repair of cAVSD 6 0.655 0.158
 F: VSD closure 6 0.928 0.008

RACHS-1: Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery, VSD: ventricular septal defect, cAVSD: complete atrioventricular septal defect, TAPVC: total anomalous pulmonary venous connection.



ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-795-5129    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail: anesthesia@kams.or.kr                

Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2community

Close layer
prev next