Korean J Anesthesiol Search

CLOSE


Korean J Anesthesiol > Volume 65(6 Suppl); 2013 > Article
Jung, Lee, Lim, Hong, and Lim: Anesthetic management of a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and patent ductus arteriosus
An anesthetic experience of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCMP) and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) simultaneously is rare. The authors report that a 30-year-old man who had HCMP with systolic anterior motion (SAM) and PDA simultaneously, successfully underwent an internal fixation of an orbital wall fracture under general anesthesia.
The 30-year-old, 157 cm, 43 kg man was admitted for internal fixation due to orbital wall fracture. The patient had a previous history of PDA at birth but didn't undergo PDA closure. He also had HCMP and was treated with beta-blockers.
The transthoracic echocardiography showed HCMP with an ejection fraction of 57%, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction with SAM, left atrial enlargement, left ventricle hypertrophy (18-22 mm), right ventricular hypertrophy, right ventricle infundibular stenosis, pulmonic valve calcification, and 6 mm PDA. The chest X-ray showed an increase in cardio-thoracic ratio 66%.
Before anesthetic induction, a continuous hemodynamic monitoring device (FloTrac sensor, Edwards, Irvine, CA, USA) was inserted by cannulation of right radial artery. To induce anesthesia, propofol 2 mg/kg and rocuronium bromide 0.6 mg/kg were intravenously administered slowly while cautiously observing blood pressure (BP) and endotracheal intubation was performed. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 1.5-2.5 vol%, O2 0.5 L/min, air 3.5 L/min (FiO2 = 30%), and remifentanil 0.1 µg/kg/min. Mechanical ventilation was conducted with a tidal volume (TV) of 8 ml/kg, respiratory rate (RR) of 10 breaths/min, a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH2O, and mean airway pressure 15 cmH2O. Because BP started to show a gradual decrease after induction, 300 ml Hartmann's solution and 0.8 µg/kg/min phenylephrine were intravenously administered. The hemodynamic parameters remained stable, with BP 110/60-130/70 mmHg, heart rate (HR) 55-60 beats/min, and stroke volume variation (SVV) 5-8% throughout the operation. And then, a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was inserted and showed no LVOT obstruction. The total surgery time was 20 minutes and the anesthetic time was 55 minutes. The patient was discharged on postoperative 3 day without any complications.
It is important to monitor BP and cardiac output (CO) by Flotrac before induction in order to predict and manage sudden and unexpected systemic hypotension (e.g., due to blood loss and hypovolemia) and triggering of dynamic LVOT obstruction.
CO and BP were continuously observed by Flotrac. Because of appropriate maintenance of preload and afterload by hemodynamic monitoring, TEE showed normal preload and contractility, and no LVOT obstruction with SAM after induction. The intraoperative cardiac index (4.0-4.4 L/min/m2) and stoke volume index (64-81 ml/beat/m2) were within the normal range. We set the goal of maintaining SVV at 10% for the appropriate preload. It is also important to select anesthetic agents in HCMP patients that will depress myocardial function and lower systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Therefore, sevoflurane was revealed as the ideal inhalation anesthetic [1]. If the patient has diastolic dysfunction, abrupt increases in HR can decrease SV by shortening diastolic filling time. We used sevoflurane and remifentanil to minimize sympathetic stimulation.
For anesthetic management in PDA patients, the avoidance of increases in SVR and decreases in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in order to prevent increases in left-to-right shunt is required [2]. Ventilatory management was used to maintain PEEP 5 cmH2O, end tidal CO2 40 mmHg, and FiO2 0.3, in accordance with treatment of pulmonary hypertension.
Because high airway pressure in HCMP patients exaggerates LVOT obstruction [1], it is important to maintain adequate minute ventilation by reducing TV and increasing RR within the framework of PVR. This respiratory management is also applied to PDA patients. In the present report, mechanical ventilation was conducted with TV 350 ml, RR 10 breaths/min, mean airway pressure 15 cmH2O, and FiO2 0.3.
Decreases in SVR should be avoided in HCMP, but increases in SVR in PDA. Direct measurement of SVR was required, however, central venous pressure (CVP) was not monitored because the surgery was minor and of short duration. Instead of CVP monitoring, the decreases in SVR was monitored by assessment of LVOT obstruction with TEE.
There are some reasons of hypotension in the HCMP patient. First, due to a decrease in SVR caused by anesthetic agents, and second, due to a decrease in preload caused by blood loss and NPO time. In this case, there were no bleeding event or dehydration symptoms. Therefore, phenylephrine was optimal drug to use in the HCMP patient to increase SVR and induce rebound bradycardia. Increasing SVR can affect left-to-right shunt in PDA, but the duration of this surgery was short, therefore this was not an issue. One hypotensive episode was experienced after induction of anesthesia in the patient, however it was possible to maintain CO and BP by continuous phenylephrine infusion according to our anesthetic plan.
In conclusion, anesthetic management in HCMP is required to increase SVR, and in PDA to decrease SVR in order to prevent aggravation of left-to-right shunt. The choice of anesthetic agents and appropriate hemodynamic monitoring are important in these contradictory anesthetic managements.

References

1. Poliac LC, Barron ME, Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Anesthesiology 2006;104:183–192. PMID: 16394705.
crossref pmid
2. Franco SA, Hines RL. Congenital heart disease. In: Hines RL, Marschall KE, editors. Stoelting's anesthesia and co-existing disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. p. 48–72.



ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-795-5129    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail: anesthesia@kams.or.kr                

Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2community

Close layer
prev next