Effect of a single dose of esmolol on the bispectral index to endotracheal intubation during desflurane anesthesia

Article information

Abstract

Introduction

The central sympathetic adrenergic response, which occurs during endotracheal intubation via an activation of the peripheral nervous system activation, results in an increase in the bispectral index (BIS) [1]. Accordingly, many interventions are used in an attempt to blunt the increase in BIS to endotracheal intubation [2-4]. Esmolol produces a dose-dependent attenuation of this adrenergic response and thus effectively prevents arousal reactions to noxious stimuli [2-5]. In a previous study, a single dose of esmolol (0.5 mg/kg) blunted the increase in BIS to endotracheal intubation with sevoflurane anesthesia, but not with desflurane anesthesia [5]. Additionally, desflurane is believed to induce greater neurocirculatory excitation - producing larger increases in sympathetic nervous activity, central venous pressure, and plasma norepinephrine (NE) concentrations - when compared with other inhaled anesthetics [6,7]. To the best of our knowledge, the effect of a single dose of esmolol on the catecholamine response to endotracheal intubation during desflurane anesthesia has not been investigated. As such, we hypothesized that a single dose of esmolol 1 mg/kg, which is a larger dose than that of the previous study [5], might blunt the BIS to endotracheal intubation during desflurane anesthesia. Hence, in this prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluate the effect of esmolol on these endpoints.

Materials and Methods

After receiving an approval from the Institutional Review Board, 60 adult patients were enrolled in the present study. Written informed consent was obtained in all cases, and all subjects had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification of either I or II, and were between 18 and 65 years of age. Patients with cardiovascular, respiratory, or neurological disease including individuals taking cardiovascular medications or predicted difficulty in endotracheal intubation were excluded from the study. Patients were then randomly divided into 3 groups of 20 by computer-generated sequence, receiving either normal saline (control group), esmolol 0.5 mg/kg (esmolol-0.5 group), or esmolol 1 mg/kg (esmolol-1 group).

No premedication was administered in any case. On arrival to the operating room, all patients were monitored by electrocardiography, noninvasive blood pressure, and pulse oximetry. For BIS monitoring, a standard BIS monitor strip (BIS Sensor®; Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, USA) was placed on the forehead so that BIS (Model A-2000; Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, USA) could be measured continuously.

The anesthetic technique used here was standardized: first anesthesia was induced with thiopental 5 mg/kg, after which rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered intravenously to achieve neuromuscular blockade. Patients were manually ventilated to maintain EtCO₂ between 35-40 mmHg, and desflurane was administered via facemask with a concomitant oxygen flow of 5 L/min. The concentration of desflurane was then increased until the end-tidal concentration reached 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), and administered for 6 min prior to endotracheal intubation. A 20-gauge radial artery catheter was inserted for the purpose of continuous arterial pressure monitoring and blood sampling. One minute prior to endotracheal intubation, either normal saline, esmolol 0.5 mg/kg or esmolol 1 mg/kg was administered intravenously to patients in a double-blinded manner. All syringes containing the study drug (same volume) were prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in the study. One minute after the administration of the normal saline or esmolol, endotracheal intubation was performed by an experienced anesthesiologist, also not involved in the study and was accomplished in less than 20 seconds. After endotracheal intubation, the lungs were ventilated with 50% air in oxygen and a 1 MAC end-tidal concentration of desflurane. No additional drugs were administered to any subjects, and no surgical procedures were performed during the study period. BIS, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were measured prior to induction of anesthesia (awake), before esmolol injection (time point -1), immediately before intubation (time point 0), and each minute for 5 min after endotracheal intubation (time points 1 to 5). If systolic blood pressure decreased below 90 mmHg, or if the heart rate decreased below 50 beats/min, ephedrine 4 mg was administered intravenously.

Arterial blood samplings (5 ml) were also collected at time points 0, 1, and 5. Within 20 min after collection, these samples underwent plasma separation by centrifuge at 3,000 r.p.m. for 7 min, then were frozen to -70℃. All plasma epinephrine (EPI) and NE concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography, with detection limits for EPI and NE of 20 pg/ml and 20 pg/ml, respectively. The coefficients of variation were 3.49-6.14% for EPI and 1.51-6.33% for NE within runs, and 4.42-6.96% and 3.92-7.46% between runs. Samples with values less than the limits of detection were considered as having concentrations just below the limit of detection.

Based on a previous study [5], the sample size required to detect a mean difference of 10 in BIS with a SD of 10 and a power of 80% at an alpha level of 0.05 was 17 patients. In order to compensate for a dropout rate of 10%, 20 patients for each group were enrolled. All data were expressed as mean ± SD. SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. Specifically, the chi-square test was used to compare sex ratios between the three groups, while comparisons of age, weight, height, BIS, MAP, HR, and catecholamine values were assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni test. Value comparisons for each measurement were also performed using repeated measures of ANOVA. All significant results were also analyzed via Tukey's post hoc test to determine whether time points produced values significantly different from preintubation. A P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Sixty patients were enrolled in this study and none were excluded or failed to complete (Fig. 1). In total, data from 60 patients were analyzed, with no differences observed in any of the demographic variables (Table 1). Additionally, no patient developed systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or HR < 50 beats/min during the study period.

Fig. 1

Flow diagram of the randomized, controlled trial.

Table 1

Demographic Data

The changes in BIS, MAP, and HR during the study period are shown in Fig. 2. At baseline, BIS values were between 95 and 99, and subsequently decreased during anesthesia induction. No intergroup differences were observed in BIS before esmolol administration. At 1 min after intubation, BIS increased significantly in all groups when compared with preintubation (34 ± 6 to 49 ± 12 vs. 36 ± 5 to 49 ± 9 vs. 36 ± 5 to 41 ± 5; P < 0.0001 vs. P < 0.0001 vs. P = 0.0001, respectively). However, the BIS value at this time point of the esmolol-1 group was significantly lower than those of the other groups (P = 0.01) (Fig. 2A). The MAP did not differ among groups prior to endotracheal intubation, while the HR also did not differ among groups before the esmolol administration. Both the MAP and HR increased significantly at 1 min after intubation in all groups when compared with the preintubation values. The MAP did not differ among three groups after intubation, whereas the HR during the time period 1 to 5 min after intubation in both the esmolol-0.5 and esmolol-1 groups was lower significantly than in the control groups (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2B and 2C). Plasma EPI and NE concentrations during the study period are shown in Fig. 3. EPI did not increase significantly after endotracheal intubation in any of the groups, whereas NE increased 1 min after intubation when compared with the preintubation measurements in the esmolol groups (P < 0.05). There were no intergroup differences between EPI and NE at each measurement point.

Fig. 2

Changes in BIS (A), MAP (B), and HR (C) before and after tracheal intubation in the three groups. Values are presented as mean ± SD. ^*P < 0.05 when compared to preintubation value. ^†P < 0.05 when compared with the values at the same time point in the control group. ^‡P < 0.05 esmolol-1 group when compared to the value in the esmolol-0.5 group at the same time point. -1: before esmolol (normal saline) administration, 0: preintubation, 1 to 5: 1 to 5 min after intubation. BIS: bispectral index, MAP: mean arterial pressure, HR: heart rate.

Fig. 3

Changes in epinephrine (A), and norepinephrine (B) before and after tracheal intubation in all three groups. Values are presented as mean ± SD. ^*P < 0.05 versus preintubation value. 0: preintubation, 1, 5: 1 and 5 min after intubation.

Discussion

In this study, a single bolus of esmolol was unable to attenuate the BIS and NE increases due to tracheal intubation during desflurane anesthesia, although the BIS value in the esmolol-1 group was lower than the other groups. The hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopic stimulation were similarly not blunted.

Previous studies have reported that anesthetic induction with desflurane increases cardiovascular responses via sympathetic activation [8,9] and these responses could be blunted by drugs that decrease or block sympathetic outflow or activity, most notably opioids, β-adrenergic antagonists, and α₂-adrenergic agonists [10].

The change in plasma catecholamine concentrations during desflurane anesthesia is more prominent than with other inhaled anesthetics due to reflex sympathetic activation from rapid increases in anesthetic concentration or laryngoscopic stimulation [7,9]. Esmolol could exert its effect on BIS by influencing sympathetic activation [2-5]. However, in the current study plasma NE concentrations 1 min after esmolol administration were not different among the three groups. Similarly, the BIS did not decrease to a greater degree in the esmolol groups prior to tracheal intubation. This observation is consistent with Berkenstadt's report [11], though in that study propofol with fentanyl was used during anesthesia induction and maintenance. As such, we contend that the lack of an effect of esmolol on BIS and serum catecholamine concentrations during desflurane anesthesia may relate to the esmolol regimen used.

Moreover, the plasma NE concentration in the esmolol group increased significantly following endotracheal intubation. Such an increase after the administration of esmolol has been reported in two settings: in individuals undergoing rapid sequence induction [12] and in patients given a single bolus of esmolol prior to intubation during isoflurane anesthesia [13]. Alterations in NE clearance after β-blockade, or greater baroreflex-mediated inhibition of the vasomotor center activity following pressor response in the control group was assumed to be one of the reasons [13]. Such increases in plasma NE concentration after a single bolus of esmolol have not been associated with desflurane anesthesia, but rather relate to the esmolol regimen. Because activation of the peripheral nerves via tracheal intubation is associated with increases in both BIS and circulating NE [1], it is unlikely that the administration of a single bolus could attenuate these sequelae. Here, sympathetic activation after laryngoscopic stimulation mediated by elevations in NE persisted despite the blunting of potential hemodynamic responses by opioids or β-adrenergic antagonists during desflurane anesthesia [7]. As such, regimens consisting of a loading dose followed by continuous infusion or simply continuous infusion of these drugs has been suggested as more efficacious in cases where the sympathetic system is substantially activated [3-4,14].

In our study, a single bolus administration of esmolol was unable to attenuate the hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation, with MAP and HR values 1 min after intubation having increased from preintubation values. Single bolus administrations of esmolol have proven insufficient in suppressing immediate hemodynamic response to laryngoscopic stimulation. One previous study demonstrated 11 different regimens and doses of esmolol as effective in attenuating HR and BP after tracheal intubation in a dose-dependent manner [14].

Notably, there are some key limitations in the study described here. First, plasma NE concentrations were not measured prior to the administration of esmolol during anesthesia induction. Nevertheless, as concentrations of NE did not differ at 1 min post-esmolol administration, esmolol is not believed to affect plasma catecholamine concentrations during desflurane anesthesia. Second, while BIS can be influenced by several factors, including changes in cardiac output that influence the pharmacokinetics of anesthetics [15], alveolar concentrations of poorly soluble drugs such as desflurane are the least sensitive to such changes.

In conclusion, our results demonstrate that a single bolus administration of esmolol is unable to attenuate BIS increases and catecholamine responses resulting from endotracheal intubation during desflurane anesthesia.

Article information Continued