Korean J Anesthesiol Search

CLOSE


Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1996;30(4):470-478.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.1996.30.4.470   
Maternal and Neonatal Effects of Thiopental Sodium-Enflurane-N2O and Propofol-N2O Anesthesia for Cesarean Section.
Sang Yun So, Jang Hoon Park, Hyun Kyung Park, He Sun Song, Huhn Choe, Young Jin Han
Department of Anesthesiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Chon Ju, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
In anesthesia for cesarean section, thiopental sodium is regarded as the standard induction agent. Propofol, 2,6 di-isopropyl phenol, is a relatively new intravenous anesthetic agent and has been used for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia or total intravenous anesthesia. Propofol has properties which suggest that it might be useful alternative to thiopental.
METHODS
Forty patients (ASA physical status 1,2) scheduled for cesarean section were randomized to either propofol (n=20) or thiopental group (n=20). In thiopental group anesthesia was induced with thiopental 4-5 mg/kg intravenously and maintained by inhalation of enflurane and nitrous oxide. In propofol group anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg intravenously and maintained by continuous infusion of propofol 6-10 mg/kg/hr and inhalation of nitrous oxide.
RESULTS
Systolic and mean arterial pressure were increased significantly in both groups at 1 min after intubation, but degree of increase were less in propofol group. There was no significant difference in diastolic pressure in both groups. Heart rate was increased significantly in both groups at afterinduction, but degree of increase were less in propofol group. The Apgar scores of the neonates and blood gas analyses of umbilical vein were not significantly different in both groups. Maternal recovery from anesthesia was quicker in propofol group.
CONCLUSIONS
A propofol infusion coupled with nitrous oxide was proved to be clinically satisfactory anesthesia for cesarean section with no adverse effect on both mother and fetus. Conclusively, propofol would be an excellant alternative to thiopental sodium and inhalation anesthetic in general anesthesia for cesarean section.
Key Words: Anesthetics; intravenous; propofol; thiopental; Pregnancy; cesarean section


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
(서울특별시 마포구 마포대로 109 롯데캐슬 프레지던트 101동 3503호)
Tel: +82-2-792-5128    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail: journal@anesthesia.or.kr                
Business Name: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists (대한마취통증의학회)
Business Registration: 106-82-07194
Representative: Young-Tae Jeon (전영태)

Copyright © 2025 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next