In many centers, endovascular treatment is considered the first-choice treatment for 60-70% of all ruptured aneurysms. However, many complications are associated with endovascular procedures, such as aneurysmal rupture, thromboembolism, bleeding, retroperitoneal hematoma, and other vascular complications [
1].
Retroperitoneal hematoma is a rare clinical entity with variable causes; its incidence is increasing mainly because of complications related to interventional procedures. Currently, it is described as a complication of femoral artery catheterization and pelvic or lumbar trauma [
1].
Retroperitoneal hematoma is a cause of significant morbidity [
2]. Unlike other bleeding sites, the retroperitoneum can harbor a large volume of blood, which remains undetected until hypovolemia occurs. This leads to delayed diagnosis, increased morbidity, and a potentially fatal result [
3].
We present a case of retroperitoneal bleeding as a consequence of femoral artery cannulation for Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC; Boston Scientific, Cork, Ireland) embolization in a patient with recanalized cerebral aneurysm.
Case Report
A 57-year-old man (height, 170 cm; weight, 67 kg) diagnosed with recanalized cerebral aneurysm of the left anterior communicating artery was scheduled to undergo GDC embolization. He had undergone the same procedure a month ago. He had no other medical condition of note. His Glasgow Coma Scale score was 12 of 15 (eye opening, 3; motor response, 5; verbal response, 4). No other focal neurological deficit was observed. His coagulation profile was normal, and his hemoglobin level was 11.8 g/dl.
The preinduction blood pressure and heart rate were 132/83 mmHg and 53 beats/min, respectively. After anesthetic induction of 4 µg/ml (effect-site concentration) propofol and 2 ng/ml remifentanil by target-controlled infusion (TCI) using an Orchestra® infusion pump system (Fresenius Kabi, Brezins, France), 50 mg rocuronium was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation.
During embolization, the blood pressure and heart rate were maintained at 102-130/68-74 mmHg and 50-60 beats/min, respectively, with a TCI of 3 µg/ml propofol and 2 ng/ml remifentanil. The right femoral artery was cannulated with a 6 Fr introducer sheath, and 3,000 IU heparin was administered intravenously to prevent thromboembolism. The embolization was successfully performed in 1 h 30 min. After the sheath for the GDC embolization procedure was removed, the femoral puncture site was closed with Perclose®, Angioseal®, and Safe Guard®.
After the anesthetics were discontinued, 0.4 mg glycopyrrolate and 1.5 mg neostigmine were administered for reversal of muscle relaxation. During emergence from anesthesia, with the endotracheal tube still in place, his blood pressure suddenly dropped to 51/23 mmHg, and his heart rate increased to 103 beats/min. Then, 10 mg ephedrine and 500 ml hydroxyethyl starch were administered intravenously. The blood pressure increased transiently to 72/53 mmHg, but dropped again. For continuous monitoring of blood pressure, the right radial artery was cannulated with a 20-G IV catheter. The patient could breathe spontaneously, but his conjunctiva was very anemic and his abdomen was rigid. His hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were 5.9 g/dl and 17.8%, respectively. The results of other laboratory tests were as follows: Na level, 146 mmol/L; K level, 3.9 mmol/L; pH, 7.29; pCO
2, 41.3 mmHg; pO
2, 416.5 mmHg; base excess, -6.8 mmol/L; creatine kinase-muscle and brain fraction (CK-MB) level, 0.2 IU/L; and troponin level, <0.01 ng/ml. No bleeding focus was detected at the femoral puncture site. Abdominal sonography was performed to screen for intraperitoneal hematomas, but no specific finding was obtained. Computed tomographic (CT) angiogram of the abdomen showed hematomas around the urinary bladder, liver, and spleen (
Fig. 1 and
2); pseudoaneurysm between the right femoral artery and right inferior epigastric artery; and active extravasation from the origin of the right inferior epigastric artery (
Fig. 3). The self-expandable stent for embolization of the bleeding site was inserted through the contralateral femoral artery (
Fig. 4). The bleeding was successfully controlled after stent insertion.
During the procedure, the blood pressure and heart rate were maintained at 110-118/67-72 mmHg and 112-123 beats/min, respectively. The patient was under anesthesia for 4 h 20 min, during which 3,000 ml crystalloid, 1,000 ml colloid, and 2 units of packed RBCs were administered; his urine output was 980 ml. After the procedure the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit.
He was extubated 9 h 30 min after the induction of anesthesia and was transfused with 3 additional units of packed RBCs. Two days later, he was transferred to the general ward. The abdominal CT scan at 7 days after the procedure showed a decrease in the size of the retroperitoneal hematoma. The patient was discharged 2 months later without any sequelae.
Discussion
We present a case of retroperitoneal hemorrhage caused by unintentional arterial puncture during femoral artery cannulation. A retroperitoneal hematoma may be associated with femoral artery puncture irrespective of whether a closure device is used after the intervention [
4]. It can be caused by an inadvertent puncture of the posterior wall of the femoral or iliac artery during cannulation.
Multiple attempts to puncture the femoral artery or puncture points high above the inguinal ligament of the femoral artery may result in occult retroperitoneal bleeding [
3,
5]. These reports probably explain the hemorrhage in our case, since multiple attempts were made to puncture the femoral artery, and the femoral artery was punctured above the level of the inguinal crease.
Even uncontrolled retroperitoneal bleeding may show initial clinical signs that are very subtle, leading to delayed diagnosis. Relative hypotension and mild tachycardia that transiently improve with the administration of fluids should alert clinicians to the possibility of retroperitoneal hematoma, and warrant further investigation [
6]. The initial symptoms may progress to hemodynamic instability and arterial collapse. Ultrasonography of the abdomen and pelvis may aid in the detection of hematomas, but it cannot help determine the cause [
2,
7]. Free fluid or blood in the retroperitoneum often flows into the abdominal or pelvic cavity, which can be detected as free abdominal fluid on an ultrasound scan [
8]. In our case, however, no abdominal fluid was identified on the sonogram. CT is a noninvasive, rapid, and highly sensitive imaging method [
9], and a CT angiogram may show the site of bleeding along with the contrast outside the vessels, an indication for urgent treatment. Active bleeding can be seen as extravasation of contrast material [
10]; this was observed in our case as well. If the patient is hemodynamically stable with no evidence of ongoing bleeding, conservative management, such as careful monitoring, fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion, and normalization of coagulation factors, is recommended. Embolization is rapidly replacing open surgery in the treatment of retroperitoneal bleeding caused by iatrogenic iliofemoral vessel injuries [
4]. Open surgery is opted if the patient remains unstable despite adequate fluid and blood product resuscitation, or if interventional radiology is unsuccessful or unavailable [
1].
In our patient, the vital signs were stable during GDC embolization. We assumed that the sheath cannulated into the femoral artery might block the bleeding focus at the site of the right inferior epigastric artery. The initial clinical sign of hemorrhage in this case was abrupt hypotension and tachycardia. The CT scan performed immediately aided in the timely diagnosis of retroperitoneal hematoma, and thereafter, the conditions were appropriately managed by both anesthesiologists and neuroradiologists.
In conclusion, anesthesiologists should be aware of the occurrence of retroperitoneal hemorrhage as a consequence of interventional procedures such as femoral arterial puncture. When On clinical suspicion, immediate imaging should be performed to determine the site and extent of the hematoma; fluid and blood product resuscitation is also essential. The severity of retroperitoneal hemorrhage in our patient suggests the need for prompt intervention in such cases.