CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Video laryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation in oromaxillofacial surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Nishkarsh Gupta, Anju Gupta, Riniki Sarma, Atul Batra, Karan Madan
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021;74(5):439-448.   Published online August 9, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.21234

Excel Download

Video laryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation in oromaxillofacial surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2021;74(5):439-448   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Efficacy of Video Laryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy During Urgent Endotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Chest. 2013;144(4):580A   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

A comparison between video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2018;47:21-26   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2019;52:6-16   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2016;116(1):27-36   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for ICU Intubation
Chest. 2018;153(1):283   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie. 2011;59(1):41-52   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for orotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Intensive Care Medicine. 2014;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy on Successful First-Pass Orotracheal Intubation Among ICU Patients
The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017;52(5):791   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in paediatric intubation: A meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2020;66:109968   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2