![]() |
CrossRef Text and Data Mining |
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining. |
Abuse potential of propofol used for sedation in gastric endoscopy and its correlation with subject characteristics |
Ja Hyun Kim, Heewon Byun, Jun Hyun Kim |
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;65(5):403-409. Published online November 29, 2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.65.5.403 |
Abuse potential of propofol used for sedation in gastric endoscopy and its correlation with subject characteristics Registered nurse-administered propofol sedation for endoscopy Tu1500 Safety of Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation During Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Tu1159 NURSE ADMINISTERED PROPOFOL SEDATION (NAPS) VERSUS ON-CALL ANESTHESIOLOGIST ADMINISTERED PROPOFOL SEDATION (OAPS) IN ELECTIVE COLONOSCOPY Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study Propofol Alone Titrated to Deep Sedation Versus Propofol in Combination with Narcotics and/Or Benzodiazepines and Targeted to Moderate Sedation for Colonoscopy Su1509 Safety and Efficacy of Propofol Sedation Without Local Pharyngeal Anesthesia for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection 3323 Synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol versus sedation with propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures. A doubleblind, randomized comparison. Comparison of Propofol Sedation Versus Conscious Sedation During Endosonography Sa1027 FROM PROPOFOL TO MIDAZOLAM/FENTANYL TO NO SEDATION DURING COLONOSCOPY: CAN THE PROPOFOL TREND BE REVERSED? |