Abuse potential of propofol used for sedation in gastric endoscopy and its correlation with subject characteristics
Ja Hyun Kim, Heewon Byun, Jun Hyun Kim
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;65(5):403-409.   Published online 2013 Nov 29     DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.65.5.403
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
Differential effects of remifentanil and sufentanil anesthesia on post-operative pain and cognitive functions
Zhenming Kang, Guoshao Zhu, Changsheng Su, Kai Zeng, Shunyuan Li, Xiaodan Wu
International Immunopharmacology.2022; 108: 108888.     CrossRef
Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2014
Richard J. Bodnar
Peptides.2016; 75: 18.     CrossRef
Le propofol comme agent de suicide ou d’abus
Philippe Hantson, Frédéric Bonbled
Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique.2016; 28(1): 10.     CrossRef
Comparison of recovery effect for sufentanil and remifentanil anesthesia with TCI in laparoscopic radical resection during colorectal cancer
Oncology Letters.2016; 11(5): 3361.     CrossRef
Prescribing patterns of the four most commonly used sedatives in endoscopic examination in Korea: Propofol, midazolam, diazepam, and lorazepam
Ju-Young Shin, Shin Haeng Lee, Sun Mi Shin, Mi Hee Kim, Sung Geon Park, Byung-Joo Park
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.2015; 71(3): 565.     CrossRef
Mechanisms of Action and Persistent Neuroplasticity by Drugs of Abuse
Esa R. Korpi, Bjørnar den Hollander, Usman Farooq, Elena Vashchinkina, Ramamoorthy Rajkumar, David J. Nutt, Petri Hyytiä, Gavin S. Dawe, Markku Koulu
Pharmacological Reviews.2015; 67(4): 872.     CrossRef
Guilty, or not guilty?: a short story of propofol abuse
Sangseok Lee
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2013; 65(5): 377.     CrossRef